To call such doctrines "material," and "binding the Divinity in chains of fatalism," if not wilfully unfair, at least betrays a narrowness of view that we may be allowed to say, ought not to find place in a work of the high character of the Edinburgh Review; and were we disposed to bandy charges-at, best but a poor mode of argument-we might be tempted:to say, that a tendency to materialism, if it any where exists, is most to be met with-although stordily denied-among the school our Reverend reviewer so stoutly represents. Listen to what he tells us, (E. R., p. 63) "We have no conception of' God,  nor can we ever have, except through such faculties as he has given us. Humanize his attributes, therefore, we must, or express ourselves in mere